Octomegaly

Octomegaly. 2⁴ not 2³. But why?

The factors cause a need for reduction to attain octa. Perhaps in biology it is better to have mega than mina.

Reductio ad absurdum… but not the fallacious kind. If you yourself reduce, can you continue to rationally multiply?

If 2⁴= 16/2=8/2=4/2=2/1

But man and woman= 2²

How can man multiply when it is missing 2²? 2¹=2 You cannot quantify the reduction by factors. How then can you rationally multiply?

How can you reduce 2²?

If an evil genius believes woman is the GCF that needs reduced, how can you factor woman out of 2² without reductio ad absurdum as a consequence? Is not the egg itself female?

We think of humans as a whole being, not parts.

How many genomic factors can be found in human men? How much can they be reduced and still be men? Is it forward progress, or a backward flop?

What whole of the human being is soul? Does it have a gender? How would we know? What if what we are taught is wrong? What if the new teachings are also wrong?

Tetragametoid. Not Tetramegaly. But why? If 3³ is used and 3⁴ are used, does the reduction of the genomic factor lead to reductio ad absurdum?

Τέτταρες γαμετή εἶδος.

Γαμετή and γαμέτης = γάμος

ἀσκέειν, περὶ τὰ νουσήματα, δύο,

NOTES

ἀσκέειν,
περὶ τὰ νουσήματα,
δύο,
ὠφελέειν,
ἢ μὴ βλάπτειν

Askéō Honor,
péri around
tá (tau) movement (Gospel of Thomas) (using tau during crucifixion to signify end of movement or earthly death)

noûs-thought

Í and?

ματα mata mind
duo two people (Aristotelian)

ôpheléôn beneficial

e and
mḗ no

Related posts:

You may be convinced to jump straight into Powerpoint to get started presentation. Don’t do it! Here’s the secret to doing The Best Startup Pitch Decks: It’s not only about the slides; it’s about the…

Today was another one of those train episodes where I could not ignore noticing a little boy on the railway platform. He was in a clean school uniform torn around the knees and nicely polished shoes…

I will start by exposing the reader to a truth that may be uncommon to the general public. The limitations that we face in our physical reality are scientifically biased. There is no way to truly…